By: Didimus Estanto T.

MURDER IS EASY
 A novel by Agatha Christie
·         Summary
The story begins with Luke Fitzwilliam way back to London from east. He was is train and in his railway coach when he met an old lady named Lavonia Pinkerton. They were easy to talk to each other. The women talked about her attention to report some murder happened in Wychwood,  her own town. She explain about mysterious person who had a strange gaze, some victim and next victim. Luke just listened and didn’t put any serious attention on that. When they got in London they take their own way. The next day Luke read a newspaper that Mrs. Pinkerton died by car accident. A week later, newspaper write about the death of dr. Humblemby, the person who Mrs. Pinkerton had predicted as a next victim. That situation pushed Luke to go to Wychwood   and investigate this strange murder.
Luke come to Wychwood  as a writer who tried to write about local superstitious. His undercover was helped by Jimmy Lorrimer whose cousin is in Wychwood .He lives there for a moment he investigated the case. Bridget Conway is Jimmy’s cousin who lived in Lord Whitfield’s house. Ms. Conway and Lord  Whitfield welcomed  Luke with pleasure. Lord  Whitfield and Ms. Conway were engaged  and  then, the investigation began.
The next day Luke tried to walk around and surf for information which he needed. Ms. Conway helped him a lot by give the information of the people and the situation there. By the time they investigated together Ms. Conway recognize that Luke is the police. In the next investigation they share the knowledge and information easier between them.
Luke realized that his effort is nothing if he still used his undercover, so he started to open his undercover to some people in the town. It was difficult to him to suspect the person because of some any different murder, unknown motif and victim, then he found a dead locked. He suspected a few people that could be a murderer, but he still have no evidence to prove his assumption. Ms Conway helped him a lot in the process of collected the evidences, but they were angry to each other because of their feeling one to the other. They finally expressed their love to each other and planned to marry.
Closes to the edge of the investigation Luke was so convinced that Ellsworthy,  the person who was estimated using black magic as a murderer. The assumption is quickly disappear when he faced a direct experience with Lord  Whitfield who has a connection to all the murder. As soon as Luke can, he reported his assumption and the result of his investigation to the official police in London and fortunately his friend is a commissaries there.  Luke did everything fast, he proclaim his relation with Ms. Conway to Lord  Whitfield, they broke the engaged in the one hand and it made Lord  Whitfield angry. Because they have suspected Lord  Whitfield as the murderer, they were afraid too much and fast go from his house.
Ms. Honoria Wayflete is Lord Whitfield’s ex fiancée. He is a great smart and generous old woman in that small city. He want to help Luke and Conway fix the murder, she also suspected Lord  Whitfield as a murderer. Unfortunately a day they went out from Lord Whitfield house, when Conway take a rest in Ms. Wayflete’s house she pretended to kill Ms Conway. She tried to put some poison to conway’s tea and wanted to bring her at a far field. She did not drink the tea. She followed Ms. Wayflete’s play and hear all the murder which she had done. Then Conway woke up and fought back after that Luke come, paralyzed the real murderer. Who can imagine that old love can blinded every people, that the broken heart old women can do terrible thing like this.
In the end of the story Ms Conway and Mr. Fitzwiliam could life happily, the real murderer was catched and the murderer in Wychwood stopped in that time.

·         Main Characters

ü  Luke Fitzwilliam, who the brave and good police try to investigated the unusual murder in Wychwood .
ü  Lord  Whitfield is a wealth man in Wychwood  who praise himself a lot, big and short guy.
ü  Bridget Conway is a beautiful smart young girl who life in Lord Whitfield’s house as a assistance, help luke investigated the murder, Jimmy’s cousin and the one who love Luke.
ü  Honoria Wayflente is Lord  Whitfield’s ex fiancé, old smart and clever woman who pretended to kill many people  and plan revenge to Lord  Whitfield who had bump her up in the past by guarantee all her murder.

·         Setting
Place : London, railway coach, all etire Wychwood , Lord  Whitfield’s house.

Time: there is no specific setting of time in that novel, there are just simple time indicator like, luch time, the next day, a week after, midsummer, in the evening, morning. 




1.      Background
Patrick White is one of my favorite writers. I do really admire him because of his experiences that he wrote in many of his works (poem, short story, play, novel and literary critic). I think the special parties of this marvelous writer is his background. He lived in two culture/ place which are Australia and England, he studied language and joined for army, he wrote some literary works while battled in some area during the World War II. Live in this kind of situation, Patrick White could understand more about the situation happened in that time all over the world. He also could write some any materials that he found during his experiences. In the same time, his literary works also could be accepted well in all over the world in that time, not only the European people. In spite of his language skills and hobby of writing, his literary works feel like a real society which written in a piece of papers. His works is so inspire for many people up to this era. Writing experiences and knowing some situations make some any people love Patrick’s works.

2.      Biography
Description: Patrick WhiteProfile
Patrick White
Born: 28 May 1912, London, United Kingdom
Died: 30 September 1990, Sydney, Australia
Residence at the time of the award: Australia
Prize motivation: "for an epic and psychological narrative art which has introduced a new continent into literature"
Field: prose
Language: English
It is important to recognize White's conflicting loyalties to Europe and Australia. In many respects the European background and influences are obvious in his writing. After spending his first school years at private schools in New South Wales, he was sent at the age of thirteen, very much against his will, to Cheltenham College in England. There he spent a "four-year prison sentence," according to his autobiography, Flaws in the Glass (1981). All the same, after a couple of years as a jackeroo on his uncle's sheep station in Australia, he chose to return to England and Cambridge in order to study modern languages. He also spent some vacations in Germany and developed a lasting interest in German and French literature.
After taking his degree, intent on forging a career for himself as a writer, he settled in London to write novels, plays and poetry. His first novel, Happy Valley (1939) was praised by some British critics, but the next, The Living and the Dead (1941), forced out prematurely because of the impending war, was a failure even according to the writer himself. The same year he received his Royal Air Force posting as an Intelligence Officer in the Middle East and Greece. His experiences in the Western Desert led him to the reading of Australian explorers. Eire's Journal of Expeditions into Central Australia evoked in him "the terrible nostalgia for the desert landscapes," a feeling that was to influence his later novels, above all Voss. His first visit to his native country after the war made him decide to settle in Australia. He was then nearly forty years old.
Even though all the later novels are wholly or mainly set in Australia, they belong to the European epic tradition insofar as they are inspired by and based on Greek mythology, Judeo-Christian mysticism, C.G. Jung's psychology, and the Joycean stream-of-consciousness technique. White has quite often been compared to the greatest among Russian and French novelists. After his return, external Australian conditions and details merged with abstractions from his European experience. In consequence, tensions both between Europe and Australia and between a "real" and a "symbolic" Australia became significant. There is also an obvious love-hate relationship with the country of his childhood. His disappointment in the materialism and shallowness of what he terms the Great Australian Emptiness, is very marked in the essay "The Prodigal Son" (1958), in which he expresses serious misgivings about the country's future. This attitude also comes to the fore in his writing, and caused many critics to accuse him of elitism and intellectual snobbery. White's "Australianness" and commitment to the continent are nevertheless generally recognized in the sense that his return brought true colours back to his palette and, in The Aunt's Story (1947), introduced a new style into his canon, initiating novels of depth and dedication.
3.      Nobel Prize
When Patrick White was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1973, the Swedish Academy's commendation referred to the author's epic and psychological narrative art as having introduced a new continent into literature. This standpoint may seem surprising now, but at that time it was a generally valid Swedish (and European) perspective - up to then literary criticism had largely ignored post-colonial writing and other new literatures in English. In many non-European countries, however, Patrick White was a well-known name, and he had already won prestigious prizes. His Nobel Literature Prize was the first to be awarded to an Australian, it is true, but the quality of Australian literature in general and of Patrick White’s writing in particular had long been recognized, not only by Australians, but also outside the country. To White's fellow-countrymen, the Nobel Prize confirmed his status as a major novelist whose fiction had, for more than twenty years, been regarded as an important
With the prize-money he created the PATRICK WHITE LITERARY AWARD to encourage the development of Australian literature. The committee has been instructed to give precedence to authors whose writing has not yet received due recognition. Among the winners have been Christina Stead, Randolph Stow, Thea Astley, and Gerald Murnane.

4.      The First Phase

The Aunt's Story and The Tree of Man

For many reasons, the two novels The Aunt's Story and The Tree of Man can be considered as the initial phase of a novel sequence. Unlike the earlier books, they are concerned with the most fundamental issues of humanity, such as the relationship between madness and sanity, reality and illusion, and the problem of communication in existential matters. For the first time, the idea of movement is structurally and consistently combined with the search for ultimate truth, the quest. Here, as in his later books, the characters are divided into two categories from a spiritual point of view: the living and the dead. The true questers are explicitly heading for salvation or damnation in a religious sense, not merely for an intenser form of life. They are opposed to the materialistic characters, who are rooted in social conventions, dreaming of possessions and gentility.
The Aunt's Story presents the quest of Theodora Goodman, a spinster, "dry, leathery and yellow." She is the first in a series of alienated, humble seekers in search of a true reality behind the appearances of social life. Like Theodora, they are all facing the choice "between the reality of illusion and the illusion of reality." Increasingly estranged from ordinary life, she passes through a series of heightened moments of insight and awareness, "epiphanies" to use James Joyce’s term, leading up to final illumination. The question is asked whether spiritual illumination is compatible with the retention of selfhood and mental sanity. Theodora Goodman's ending is characteristically ambiguous. To the world, she appears to be mentally deranged when she is finally led away by Doctor Holstius, whose name hints at a sense of ultimate wholeness. Holstius knows that "lucidity isn't necessarily a perpetual ailment," and he summarises the lesson she has learnt: "You cannot reconcile joy and sorrow. Or flesh and marble, or illusion and reality, or life and death. For this reason, Theodora Goodman, you must accept." Like all the later questers, she experiences that "for the pure abstract pleasure of knowing, there was a price paid."
The changes in setting between the various parts of the novel are related to the mental development of the protagonist to such an extent that it is unclear whether Theodora’s odyssey carries her across oceans and continents in a physical sense, or whether the whole journey takes place in her troubled mind. There is a significant epigraph from Olive Schreiner for the third part of the novel: "When your life is most real, to me you are mad."
The Tree of Man was the first novel to win international acclaim. On the narrative level, it deals with the hardships of a farming couple, Stan and Amy Parker, in New South Wales. The frame is that of the conventional pioneering saga, albeit with biblical overtones and associations. Stan is one of White's characteristic seekers, and his spiritual capacity is set off against Amy's conventional attitudes. Stan "respected and accepted her mysteries, as she could never respect and accept his." The story contains the typical features of Australia's natural trials and disasters, such as bushfires, drought, and floods, but above all it enacts the psychological drama of Stan's desire to understand the purposes of God, which "are made clear to some old women, and nuns and idiots." The background and aim of the novel are indicated in White's essay "The Prodigal Son":
It was the exaltation of the "average" that made me panic most, and in this frame of mind, in spite of myself, I began to conceive another novel. Because the void I had to fill was so immense, I wanted to try to suggest in this book every possible aspect of life, through the lives of an ordinary man and woman. But at the same time I wanted to discover the extraordinary behind the ordinary, the mystery and the poetry, which alone could make bearable the lives of such people, and incidentally, my own life since my return.
So I began to write THE TREE OF MAN.
It was Patrick’s statement when he began to write this marvelous novel.
5.      References
White, Patrick. The Aunt's Story. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1948.
White, Patrick. The Tree of Man. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode, 1956.
http://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/white-patrick, taken on Tuesday December 10 at 09.12 a.m.
http://www.theguardian.com/books/2015/mar/09/patrick-white, taken on Tuesday December 10 at 09.20 a.m.








Freedom
(Tanto Didimus / dec 2015)

love abundent us
aspiration claim us
usually we join stupid thing
just to see other's freedom

freedom is free
it make us to be cocreator
be like a person who says
dangerously free you are

battle in the world is fake
battleis you is real
you fake your self
just to make it free

where are you free?
hiding behind the dark
waiting for the shadow come upon
i'd loved to catch you

freedomis here
in my hand scream for free
come and take it
you are free to be free




Wind
(Tamto Didimus/ dec 2015)

gone silent on the dark
blew spring such a light
drowned deeper in the night
dissappear in the star

you,..
aint me kilking you
you your self did it
i love you like wind
touch every parties

i wanna fly
healing like a water
red like a blood
gone like a wind

gone...
go gone you forever
basted dear loved me
wind please take "it" away
this basted wind





MERAIH KEMBALI SEMANGAT MULTIKULTUR

Beberapa minggu belakangan ini di Yogyakarta banyak  peristiwa  menyangkut kehidupan multikultur yang membuat roda ingatan saya seakan dipaksa memutar kembali ke belakang, sekitar akhir tahun 80-an.  Sebagai mahasiswa baru salah satu pergurun tinggi seni negeri di kota pelajar ini, banyak hal baru yang cukup membekas di ruang rasa dan benak.  Kala itu hal pertama yang terkesan adalah semangat membuat sebuah komunitas yang menjamur hampir di seluruh perguruan tinggi bahkan di lapisan masyarakat yang ada.  Perbincangan di indekosan mahasiswa pun tak lepas dari bisik-bisik; ...bahwa di perguruan sana sekarang muncul kelompok ini, atau si A dan kelompoknya sekarang membuat kumpulan diskusi di sana... dan sebagainya. Belum lagi berita bahwa si C yang pelukis sekaligus penyair itu akan membuat pameran tunggal di gedung D begitu seterusnya.  Lalu saat malam baru naik di cakrawala, saya bersama beberapa teman seringkali berjalan kaki dari kontrakan di daerah Jetis menuju Malioboro.  Di sepanjang Jl. Mangkubumi hingga Kepatihan Malioboro,  kami bertemu teman-teman mahasiswa seni yang sedang asik menggambar sketsa malam atau melukis wajah pesanan turis lokal ataupun manca. Tak sekedar menggores, merekapun bercanda seakan tak ada jarak batas sekat.  Lalu lintas kala itu masih terasa lengang, seolah ikut merayakan peristiwa-peristiwa kecil di titik-titik kumpul mereka. Saat malam semakin larut, angkringan di seputar malioboro justru semakin sesak didatangi para penggemar tongkrongan.  Di kalangan mahasiswa dan aktivis , salah satu lokasi Malioboro kala itu dijadikan semacam titik favorit berjumpa yang kemudian terkenal dengan sebutan  poros Bulak sumur-Malioboro-Gampingan. (Bulaksumur representasi dari UGM atau intelektual ilmu pengetahuan – science dan Gampingan representasi dari ASRI/ISI atau kesenian-art). Di tempat itulah, kita bisa berjumpa dengan para aktivis, budayawan  dan pegiat kesenian yang berkumpul bersama pengamen jalanan bahkan tukang becak dan asongan.  Dengan mudahnya mereka berbaur; tak sulit kita bertemu Butet Kertarajasa,  Landung Simatupang, Cak Nun, Sawung Jabo yang masih muda, Ashadi Siregar (alm) yang mungkin sedang bercanda nyek-nyekan (saling ejek) dengan Linus Suryadi(alm),  bahkan seringkali hadir Budayawan senior seperti Umar Kayam (alm), Maestro lukis Affandi (alm). Suasana bertambah ramai saat hadir tokoh yang disebut Presiden Malioboro, Umbu Landu Paranggi. Tak perduli dari mana asal mereka, seberapa miskinnya mereka, apa disiplin ilmunya, siapa orang tuanya, kostum apa yang mereka kenakan dan sebagainya.  Yang tua berbaur dengan sang muda belia bahkan tak segan mereka maju mempertunjukkan puisi, lagu  atau sekedar ketawa-ketiwi nyengir tersindir hal-hal remeh tanpa perlu tersinggung.  Namun dari situlah ada suatu nilai yang bisa  disebut energi menjaga rasa. Tanpa perlu memperbincangkan persaingan yang muncul, peristiwa pertemuan  budaya tersebut mampu menggerakkan segenap daya kreatif dalam lingkaran untuk kemudian mendorong luar biasa ke luar lingkaran yang mewujud dalam semangat kemanusiaan. Rupanya Dialog dan komunitas itu sanggup mengurai perasaan minder, keterkucilan dan keterasingan budaya. Guliran situasi seperti itu juga kita jumpai di berbagai tempat tidak hanya urusan seni, budaya bahkan sosial politik seperti di lakukan organisasi mahasiswa ekstra kampus seperti PMKRI di Marga siswa,  dengan rekan-rekan Ormas seperti GMKI, GMNI, PMII, HMI dll. Tulisan-tulisan di media cetak pun tak jauh dari hal ini. 
Situasi di atas dimana arus ledakan teknologi  baru berada di ambang pintu, bisa dibaca sebagai peristiwa pertemuan multikultur yang sebenarnya. Dimana mereka begitu sadar bahwa mereka beda baik latar belakang kebiasaan, bahasa, asal, ras atau suku, agama dan lain-lain. Namun tetap saja mereka bertemu, berafiliasi  satu dengan yang lain. Romo Mangunwijaya pernah mengatakantentang hal ini; “...bahwa nomor satu bukanlah masalah agama melainkan religiositas.”  Di sini beliau mengingatkan kembali bahwa religiositas merupakan hal terpenting dibandingkan dengan masalah agama, karena kunci utama sebuah religiositas adalah beriman. Beriman tidaklah melulu urusan ritual keagamaan dan segala yang dogmatis. Beriman, lebih pada mengakui bahwa kita  adalah makhluk Tuhan yang bermartabat dan kemudian mewujud dalam laku ziarah manusia itu.
Komunitas-komunitas yang terbentuk perlu dipahami tidak ditujukan sebagai sarana  mereduksi eksistensi latar belakang sendiri namun justru menjaga rasa kebanggaan diri sendiri yang kemudian mendorong mereka lebih membumi dalam kehidupan sosial mereka. Misalnya, kita bisa menemui seorang tukang becak yang hidup dalam masyarakat multikultural, beliau akan selalu bangga dengan pekerjaannya dan menekuninya dengan baik, begitu pula tukang kayu yang setia menekuni profesinya dan menyatakan dalam laku kesehariannya. Atau seorang mahasiswa ilmu sosial yang setia berusaha memperdalam ilmunya, sementara si mahasiswa seni pun tekun mengasah kegelisahan-kegelisahannya dan menyatakannya dalam bentuk karya seni. Mereka pun tak segan bertemu dan saling berbincang tanpa harus menukar keilmuannya atau mengalahkan yang lain.
Multikultur tidakk jauh seumpama gado-gado atau salad yang masing–masing punya rasa namun melebur. Mereka paham dan mengenal apa itu perbedaan-perbedaan. Mengenal perbedaan inilah yang penting.  Maka, di saat yang sama ketika situasi politik saat itu menuju pada tingkat represi yang semakin tinggi (yang dilakukan rezim orde baru) dan hendak mengebiri rasa kebersamaan dan mengabaikan martabat kemanusiaan, ada semacam paduan suara penolakan yang melantun bersama dalam gejolak di masyarakat. Baik di tingkat perguruan tinggi, maupunlapisan masyarakat kebanyakan. Tak heran jika situasi represif itu justru memompa kemunculan gerakan-gerakan sosial kemasyarakatan seperti contoh FKMY (Forum Komunikasi mahasiswa Yogyakarta) yang digagas saat munculnya kebijakan NKK/BKK dan kemudian menjadi DMPY dan SMY, Rode.  Kemudian muncul pula komunitas Kyai Kanjeng. Di satu sisi, gerakan formal ekstra kampus pun kembali bergerak dalam ranah perjuangannya sendiri seperti Kelompok Cipayung (PMKRI, HMI, GMNI, GMKI, PMII dll). Tak cukup di situ, kita bisa menjumpai kelompok-kelompok studi di kampus-kampus yang kemudian berjuang lewat gerakan jurnalistik (pers kampus). Semuanya membaitkan perlawanan terhadap reduksi kebebasan dan hak masyarakat.


Teori sosial ke 3 dari Ricardo L. Garcia (1982) yang menjelaskan hubungan antar individu dalam masyarakat yang beragam ini sepertinya sesuai dengan harapan dan perjuangan yang dilakukan masyarakat saat itu, dimana masyarakat multikulturalisme yakni: ...Individu- individu yang beragam latar belakang agama, etnik, bahasa dan budaya memiliki hak untuk mengekspresikan identitas budayanya secara demokratis dengan tidak meminggirkan budaya kelompok minoritas.

MULTIKULTUR DI YOGYA SAAT INI
Melihat Yogyakarta sekarang seolah segala peristiwa pertemuan dan perayaan itu hilang tak tercium tak membekas. Yogyakarta kini adalah kota dengan tingkat kekerasan berdasarkan SARA  paling tinggi di Indonesia.  Yang terakhir terjadi adalah peristiwa penyerbuan Camping rohani yang diadakan jemaat Kristen Advent hari ke tujuh oleh FJI (front Jihad Islamiyah), kemudian pemblokiran Gereja Kristen di Bantul dan terakhir adalah penolakan FUI (Forum Umat Islam/Ukhuwah Islamiyah) terhadap Goa Maria Giriwening Kamis lalu (10/7) yang memaksa agar Pemkab Gunung Kidul tidak memberi ijin terhadap kegiatan umat Katholik di sana. Apa sebenarnya yang terjadi?
John Naisbitt dan Patricia Aburdene (1990)  sebetulnya telah mencoba menyadarkan kita bahwa akhir abad XX akan terjadi lompatan besar kemajuan tekhnologi yang mengakibatkan perubahan besar-besaran tata nilai dalam kehidupan. Munculnya media elektronik seperti TV yang beragam, adanya CD, VCD, DVD serta Hp dan internet adalah faktor-faktor pendukung akselerasi perubahan nilai kehidupan masyarakat tersebut. Ruang-ruang diskusi dan pertemuan tergantikan dengan gadget-gadget baru. Masyarakat menjadi lebih individual sedangkan relasi rasa yang hanya bisa dibangun saat manusia bertemu dengan manusia lain menjadi hilang. Duniapun seolah menjadi perkampungan global dimana antar negara tak ada lagi sekat batas kecuali batas teritorial. Pandangan masyarakat terhadap nilai-nilai kehidupan pun berubah. Ada kecenderungan, masyarakat dipaksa merubah pola pikir dari tradisional menjadi modern. Resiko paling besar adalah munculnya kecemburuan sosial  dikala penyebaran kemakmuran menjadi tak berimbang karena kebijakan-kebijakan regulasi pengampu kekuasaan yang terlanjur begitu lama mementingkan yang kaya. Teknologi pun menjadi tidak netral ketika dikuasai oleh sekelompok orang saja. Begitupun ideologi kekerasan, pragmatisme, individual menjadi makanan sehari-hari masyarakat. Kita dibentuk menjadi tidak kenal satu sama lain bahkan lebih suka berhenti pada kebanggaan diri dan kelompoknya saja tanpa ada keinginan afiliasi dengan yang berbeda. Masyarakat menjadi asing dengan dirinya. Di sinilah paham dominasi dan subordinasi mengemuka baik dikalangan minoritas maupun mayoritas.

MERAIH YANG TELAH LAMA LEPAS
Beberapa saat lalu telah dialkukan pertemuan antara Uskup KAS dengan komunitas JNM (Jaringan Nahdliyin Mataram) terkait isu Sabda Raja Sultan HB X. Salah satu point yang mengemuka adalah keprihatinan bahwa kita telah kehilangan tokoh dan semangat yang mengobarkan pluralitas dan multikultur. Semangat pertemuan rasa yang dulu pernah dirayakan bersama telah berganti dengan semangat proyek bahkan cenderung menonjolkan superioritas keagamaan yang saling mengalahkan. Kita seringkali menjadi gamang jika harus bertemu sahabat-sahabat kita yang muslim, atau Hindu dan Budha. Jebakan individualisme berbalut kecurigaan atau malah minder telah terlanjur kuat mengakar bersama kuatnya arus teknologi dan modernisasi. Seringkali kita tergagap dengan banyaknya peristiwa yang mengoyak rasa kebersamaan antar manusia namun tak tahu apa yang yang dilakukan. Baju kita pun kadang bernoda pekat namun kita tak sadar melihat karena ada noda itu melekat kuat di bagian belakang baju.  Maka hemat saya, harus ada dobrakan kebekuan sekaligus kemauan untuk mengevaluasi secara etis segala yang telah kita lakukan. Sesekali kita harus mau mengganti baju dan mencucinya; Jangan-jangan apa yang kita lakukan selama ini salah arah sehingga semangat kebersamaan dan kasih justru semakin jauh dari rengkuhan.  Baiklah kita ikut ambil bagian dalam pusaran rajutan tadi. Membangun komunitas bersama antar kelompok atau individu yang berbeda dengan semangat religiusitas dan lebih menghormati martabat manusia patut kita perjuangkan bersama.










Unity in Diversity
            In the 19th century after cold war between America and Rusia, a sociology expert named Samuel Huntington predict there will be a clash of civilization between west and east culture. It will be dominated by liberalism and communism. Liberalism is the concept of the west, and communism is the concept of the east. This clash is caused by the different of the ideology and it was getting in hard after the cold war. Each country choose their own block, this makes Huntington creates a thesis about the clash of civilization.
            Indonesia, in the regime of Soekarno is influenced by the communism of Russia that makes by Vladimir Lenin. Soekarno applied communism system in constitution of Indonesia. This also creates Indonesian Communism Party. In 21th century, this world watching a phenomena that different than the predict by Huntington. West and east create a great relation, especially in international trading. For example, America and China make a trading cooperation. Indonesia and America make military cooperation, etc. This caused by the condition in each country in the west and east. Each country need other countries to build its nation. Therefore, they joined in the international organization, convention, and ratification many rule to get their importance and interest. That is the significant example about the multiculturalism in the world. By the cooperation and convention, each country will know the condition in another country. After know the condition, they will make a cooperation or help another country.
           
History of Indonesian People
            One scholar considers that the first Indonesian humans were of the broad ethnic group we now call Australo-Melanesians and that they were ancestor of the Melanesians of New Guinea, the Australian Aborigines, and the small negrito communities of Malay Peninsula and the Philippines. Archaeological speculation suggests that due to the ancient exposure of the Sudanese shelf (between the Malay Peninsula and the western Indonesian archipelago), many different peoples migrated and intermixed in prehistoric times. This explanation also traces the Indonesian islands and beyond linguistically, with the beginning of the migration of the peoples of Austronesian language group from Taiwan about 5,000 years ago expanding as numerous divisions migrated to various islands regions. Some words derived from Austronesian language remain similar from Indonesia to Hawaii. The Austronesians venture as far as Madagascar, off the east coast of Africa and to Easter islands in the eastern pacific. They dramatically distinguished a huge sweep of islands between Africa and Megalithic arch. Places Austronesians settled typically display large stone monuments. The immense heads of Easter Island are the most famous examples.
 Multiculturalism in Indonesia
Indonesia famed with the many culture, ethnics, characters, and its religions. Indonesia also can accommodate that many differences to be the one nation. Pancasila has been the history and the purpose of the Indonesia is exist. Pancasila containing many values and norms that makes Indonesian people united. Demarcation principia and great law is the heap that support cultural and religion dialog. Juergen Habermas said that communication behavior is the fundament of the social-cultural life although to all of human acknowledge. The main thing of Habermas theory is about communication or dialog. Dialog is the way out to solve any problem or clash that caused by differences. According to Habermas, to minimalize the differences in the society, the dialog between culture and religion must be taken in order to vanish the clash potential.
            As the country that have many difference, until now Indonesia still in the good condition although for its independent, many problem about ethnics and religion issue still happening, but not at all change to a big problem or cause war in the country. All the problems can solve by the government and all Indonesian people can solve the problem. In this year, Indonesia celebrating its 70th independent, and until this year Indonesia still a country that containing many ethics and religions, but have one principle that is “unity”. If Samuel Huntington predict that there will be happen the clash of civilization, in Indonesia the civilization was blinding. Why do I say that?  It is because, any tourist that visit Indonesia is coming from many countries in the world, and here they do not have sentiment to another people of different country.
            In the other side, the writer realized that the differences in Indonesia need to manage by the good way. Many conflict for sometimes caused by the differences that happened in Indonesia. Each difference need the different strategy to solve and its always cause many conflict. Primordialism dan etnoncentrism are caused by hard difference in society, it is also the phenomen that we can find in Indonesia. Sometimes some ethnic feel that their group is better  than another, but another group don’t think like that. The government have many way to solve this problem, one of them is by make a regulate about district otonomy. District otonomy can be the good solving if the government implemented it very well. But, for a long time this maybe change to the critis. Many problem about the multiculturalism still happening in many district in Indonesia. It makes that multiculturalism is not about the blessing for us, but it is a homework that must be solving.
            We always said that “pancasila” is Indonesian way of life and “Bhineka Tunggal Ika” is our principles to stay together, but what happening before, now, and maybe in the future is different of the values that containing in Pancasila. If we studying from the theory of Samuel Huntington, there will be right if he said that in 21th century, it will happen the clash of civilizations, but in the smaller environment, that is Indonesia. Primordialism and ethnocentrism is the significant example if we want to know that Indonesia still have homework about multiculturalism. Government also influenced by the primordialism and etnosentrism. Any government take their family or their ethnic member to join with them in the governance.  Indonesia must use multiculturalism thinking in working paradigm, not usually use family or ethnic group paradigm. If we do that, we just looking for the benefit for our self, not for the peace and good for our country.

How to Solve?
            As the writer said in the beginning that Juergen Habermas effort a way to solve the problem. The writer think that it is the effective to use personal approach that must we try. Dialog between ethics, group, and religion can help us to know about the others. Seriously, Pancasila has tell us about it, but we just do not implemented it. Dialog between ethnic and group could be realized by the discussion or respect with the tradition of another group if it is not destroy the secureness. We do not want to lose the originality of each culture, but we just want to combine us in a mission to build this country and to make our nation be better than before.